User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Jasmin Moghbeli official portrait.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jasmin Moghbeli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your TBAN appeal[edit]

Hello. I just closed the discussion at ANU which means that you may now create regular DRs again. Please read my summary over there and feel free to get back to me here if you have questions. Happy editing/uploading and good luck with any future DRs. De728631 (talk) 12:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

re Commons:Deletion requests/File:P1000015 - panoramio Doha Tower.jpg
Now this is an FoP issue about FoP in Qatar. I note that since your TBAN was lifted you have already submitted a significant number of DRs based on FoP: Commons:Deletion_requests/2022/08/31. However FoP has always been recognised as a complex topic; if an image has to be deleted, then so be it. But we should not be quick to judge other editors for not understanding such rules.
Your action though was to make a further specific action, "Stop uploading copyright violations, please" and to threaten a block, "users who fail to meet them may be blocked.". Your message as to why you want to block them was itself incorrect, "one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status."
I have some sympathy for @InterEdit88: here. They didn't upload this image. The image was uploaded by Commons' own Panoramio upload bot, to File:P1000015 - panoramio.jpg and then further labelled as validly licensed by Panoramio upload bot, with a big green tick mark and everything. All that Inter88 has done here is to extract a cropped image of File:P1000015 - panoramio Doha Tower.jpg from that. I can hardly hold this against Inter88!
If it's so vital that infringing images like this are hunted down and their wicked uploaders threatened with blocks, then why have you done nothing about File:P1000015 - panoramio.jpg? You've gone after an uploader (who wasn't even the uploader), same as you went after that same uploader two years ago, seeing what you could find to delete: [1] Yet you seem far less interested in cleaning up the content itself.
This is exactly the sort of behaviour that brought your TBAN. Will it be necessary to reinstate it so soon? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Andy Dingley: I honestly don't remember what files that I have nominated two years ago, I don't go after anybody's upload and see if they have any problematic uploads. The notice above is a rather mild one. I don't see a big problem here. But this is a good issue to argue whether cropping/modifying other's problematic uploads are also counted as copyvio or not. You may start a discussion at COM:VP. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images[edit]

Is there any downside to this image not being valuable?

@Aurelio de Sandoval: VI means that the image is the best on the corresponding scope. Unless an editor review it and believe it is the best within the scope, they cannot give a support vote. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@A1Cafel: Please can you tell me what is the impediment or the scope is not good?.--BTS Begins Logo.svgAurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)
@Aurelio de Sandoval: It's rather vague, I cannot tell you because every nomination has its own problems. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Keizo Obuchi cropped Keizo Obuchi 19890107.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Announcement of Heisei as new era name of Japan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Christmas 2019 Downing Street Decoration (2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Christmas 2019 Downing Street Decoration (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52345186772).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52345186772).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:4453:54A:CA00:C099:89CB:167C:FA1E 23:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Le fonti della ricerca[edit]

Please note that all the files in that category had a WLM permission. I suppose that you already did several careless deletion requests. Let that one be the last one, and check the files you nominate for deletion, one by one next time. Thanks Ruthven (msg) 07:26, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BOOK OF CONDOLENCE deletion requests[edit]

Regarding the deletion requests made to the Flickr images from the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, are you claiming they are not under CC BY 2 as is claimed on Flickr, or that we should just add an attribution line to the info template? If the second why not just add the that? Cakelot1 (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Cakelot1: This is a kind of license landuring, which means FCDO is not the copyright holder of those nominated files. The copyright belongs to the stated photographer from PA Media Assignments. Permission from PA Media Assignments is required in this case. You may submit the written permission to VRT after getting the approval from the institution. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do you really believe that the united kingdom's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office didn't commission these images of Foreign and commonwealth dignitaries in government buildings. Cakelot1 (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also if the FCDO didn't mean to release these images under CCBY2.0 then why do you think they added a required attribution line to the description, surely this wouldn't be something that they do if they were showing what they knew were not released under a licence that requires that. Cakelot1 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:God Save the King - Funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:God Save the King - Funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cakelot1 (talk) 18:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Relações Internacionais - Funeral da Rainha Elizabeth II.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Relações Internacionais - Funeral da Rainha Elizabeth II.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cakelot1 (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NOT FOR PUBLIC -- Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in a Global Survivor Fund Event (52377321295).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:NOT FOR PUBLIC -- Deputy Secretary Sherman Participates in a Global Survivor Fund Event (52377321295).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

218.250.39.169 05:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:How Many Lives ? Sign in woods in Glover Park (49973965532).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:How Many Lives ? Sign in woods in Glover Park (49973965532).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Closeapple (talk) 16:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]